Archive for July, 2009
Review of the Vertical Jump Bible, Part 1
I love basketball. L. O. V. E. love. I love watching it – both college and pro – I love playing it, I love talking about it, and I can already tell I will love blogging about it. And, being that I’m a skinny 5’8″ white guy, of course one of my dreams is to be able to dunk a basketball. Regulation size, on a regulation hoop.
So, I’ve set out on a mission to improve my vertical jumping ability and reach that goal. At 26 years old, I think my peak-athletic window is closing, so it’s now or never, and with that I took the plunge and purchased one of those sketchy-feeling vertical leap training manuals, specifically the Vertical Jump Bible. One look at that website will tell you all you need to know about why I was hesitant to spend money on this, but my own exercise routine wasn’t cutting it and I thought, if nothing else, it would be $40 well spent toward some entertaining blog stories.
I also thought this would be a great opportunity to actually review this manual. There’s a ton of information online (as with all things) for increasing one’s vertical, with some packages claiming “super secret formula” going for as high as $300! And while all of these sites have plenty of testimonials, there’s very little in the way of real review and analysis. The best I could find were short threads on various bulletin boards of people saying it was or wasn’t good, never going in-depth. At $40, the VJB is one of the cheaper options out there with at least some people online claiming that it’s effective. It’ll be some weeks before I can definitively answer that, but I’ve already gained some insight that hopefully will benefit future short caucasians in their quest for that elusive slam-dunk glory.
What you get when you purchase the Vertical Jump Bible
For $40, you get the main training guide, about 150 pages, plus two supplements (20 and 50 pages), all as PDFs. Except, the main guide is protected by Virtual Vault software from CBP, a stupid method of blocking access to things like printing out the document or sharing it with others. The VJB website actually says that you can print the document, but I couldn’t get it to. Not only that, but when you first open the file you have to register it with the Virtual Vault software, after which it becomes licensed to THAT COMPUTER ONLY. Meaning you can’t open and read the file anywhere else. If you registered this on your laptop and then your harddrive died…oh well. Plus, it only works on Windows. Own a Mac and you just paid $40 for this? Too bad. Not exactly customer friendly.
Fortunately, the Virtual Vault software is basically nothing but a file wrapper: I fired up a hex editor, deleted the protection stuff around the actual book, and voila, I now have an unrestricted PDF. To the author of the Vertical Jump Bible: stop wasting money on DRM. Your book is not that special, you’re only frustrating your customers, and you’re stuffing CBP’s pockets for a product that anyone can break in a couple of minutes.
My baseline
Of course, before I can review the performance of the VJB, I needed to get a baseline. How high can I actually jump? And more importantly, how much higher do I need to jump to be able to dunk?

Makeshift vertical jump meter
So I got my best friend to help me set up a makeshift vertical leap measure. With a tape measure, some scrap paper, and some scotch tape, we created this –>
Each strip of paper is 1 inch tall, and we marked from 8 feet to 9’6″. We then took some basic measurements: my standing reach (how high I can reach when flat footed on the ground), my stationary vertical leap (how high I can jump from a standing postion), and my running vertical leap. My friend spotted my measurements (from a step ladder) as I flailed and swatted at tiny strips of paper.
Here are my results:
| Measurement | Height (inches) |
| Standing Reach | 90 |
| Stationary vertical | 108 |
| Running vertical | 114 |
So I have a standing reach of 7’6″ and a standing vertical of 9′, giving me an 18 inch vertical jump. But that’s just straight up from a standstill. With a running start, I reached 9’6″ for a 24 inch vert. Certainly not a bad start. But definitely a lot of room for improvement. After these tests, I’ve settled on a lofty goal: I want to add another 22 inches to my vertical. I figure, 6 more gets me to the rim, another 12 gets my hand high enough to actually dunk, and another 4 gets my elbow almost to the rim, at which point I could do some spectacular things
. A 46″ leap: the dream of every 5’8″ guy who’s ever touched a basketball.

Standing under my makeshift vertical jump measuring tool

Rising up for a vertical jump from a running start
But can the Vertical Jump Bible get me there? It’s certainly not going to happen overnight, but if the online testimonials are to be at all believed, even more impressive feats have been achieved, so we’ll see. I’ll be back in a few weeks to update on my progress and give some more insight into how much value a $40 pdf about jumping can actually provide.
The day that Apple killed the iPhone (for me, anyway)
I’ve had the iPhone 3G for a year now, and I’ve been really happy with it. My wife and I switched from Sprint to AT&T to get it (even paid a hefty early-termination fee) because Sprint was sucktastic and we wanted the new hotness. And all was good in the land of Oz, until…
Apple and AT&T started crippling the iPhone with their “amazing” App Store. Which really is amazing, but could be so much better if they’d actually open it up and let in all the cool stuff. You can find tons of info on how the App Store approval process makes no sense with a simple Google search, but just a few examples are blocking the video streaming app Qik, crippling the Sling Player app (wifi only), and recently forcing Google to make their Latitude service into a web app instead of native application.
And now, for me at least, the last straw came yesterday when Sean Kovacs, the developer of the GV Mobile app that lets you connect to and use your Google Voice account, announced that Apple was pulling his app from the App Store (along with the other GV apps). After that news broke, more info leaked out about how Google had even submitted their own GV app some six weeks ago which Apple would not allow into the App Store. Meanwhile, there are native Google apps for Google Voice available on both Blackberry and Android phones (as well as other iPhone-unavailable apps, like Qik), and there remain apps in the App Store that do the same kinds of things GV Mobile did.
If you don’t yet know about Google Voice, I suggest you look into it. It’s still an invite-only service, but Google is making a strong effort to open it up to many users, and for a lot of reasons it looks great. The big ones though are that it gives you a new, “central” phone number that you can use to channel all of your phone calls through, along with the ability to have your voicemails transcribed to text and emailed to you, and free sms messages. All big things for cell phone users and people juggling several numbers (office, home landline, cell, perhaps a business cell, etc).
However, there are some limitations to using the service, the biggest of which is that while you may have a shiny new GV number for people to call you, when you call them they still see your old phone number. An iPhone (or Blackberry or Android or Windows Mobile) app can fix this, which is exactly what GV Mobile and others were doing. And now, inexplicably, that’s over and gone.
Personally, I’m sick of it. I laid out a lot of cash in order to get a device that was supposed to free me from the constraints of typical cell phones. And while it started out on the right path, things took a wrong turn somewhere and now I’m more aware of what I can’t do with it than what I can. If somebody asked me today whether they should switch to AT&T to get an iPhone, my answer would be an emphatic NO. And if you’re already on AT&T? Well, it would be a big MAYBE, depending on what you want it for. Personally, I want streaming video and Google Voice on my phone, and it’s looking like I’m going to have to jump ship again to get it.
If you’re in the same boat as me, you have a few options. You could jailbreak your phone to get some of these restricted apps (Gizmodo has a great step-by-step guide) – Kovacs has released GV Mobile for jailbroken phones. Or you could sell your iPhone to pay for the early termination fees and pick up an Android or Blackberry handset (or maybe the Palm Pre) from Verizon or Sprint. I’d also suggest leaving Apple some feedback, in the hopes that they get the message and repent. Here’s what I submitted to Apple through their iPhone feedback form:
The news today that Apple is not only pulling all of the Google Voice apps from the App Store, but has also already blocked the addition of Google’s exclusive GV app, has infuriated me to the point of considering my options for ditching the iPhone and AT&T. There’s been plenty of examples of the shoddy state of the App Store and the decisions about what gets in or not, and this is for me just the last straw.
I switched from Sprint to AT&T to get the iPhone 3G last year, and I’ve been extremely happy overall with both the phone and the carrier. But the main reason I love the iPhone, and why I tell others to get one, is because of the App Store and how it opens up the platform to be so much more than just a regular cell phone. I’m sorry, AT&T, if Google Voice scares you, but you’re already doing enough to discourage me as a customer with exorbitant sms fees and blocking or crippling other apps like Qik, Sling player, and Google Latitude. But keeping these apps away from me is not doing anything to persuade me to stick with you. I’m not going to stop paying you over $100/mo for cell phone service just because I now have a Google Voice app. It just means I’ll be using a new number, and not texting through your service (which I avoid like the plague anyhow). And Apple: bowing to the pressure of AT&T, whatever the reasons, makes you just as culpable.
If it means switching to Verizon or Sprint and buying an AndroidOS phone or a Blackberry so that I can get apps like Qik and Google Voice for my phone, so be it. I’m sick of this shit, and unless you all do an about face really quick then I’m not going to deal with it anymore.
I don’t have any delusions about my (in)significance to Apple and AT&T, but that doesn’t mean I have to sit idly by and accept their baloney, and neither do you. If there’s one thing these companies will listen to, it’s our dollars, and as long as they’re blocking Google Voice apps I don’t want to give them any more of mine.
Update: A great article from TechCrunch (with some amazing comments) on why Apple may have pulled Google Voice
Update: And a great article from LifeHacker exploring why this is such a big issue, and ultimately not just for iPhone owners.
Where’s Craigslist 2.0?
I’ve been selling a lot of stuff on craigslist.org recently, and while I absolutely love the site for the ability to turn my boxes of junk into quick cash, the more I use it the more I feel like it’s long overdue for an upgrade. In this interview a year ago, the eponymous Craig Newmark of Craigslist mentions that the site is written mostly in Perl. The function and design haven’t changed much in nearly 10 years. And while the rest of the internet has grown around new asynchronous technologies and social networking, a site that’s a perfect fit for both seems to have been left behind.
But that isn’t what baffles me. Craigslist on its own is doing just fine. They’re still the go-to site for online classifieds. What I can’t figure out is why, without any innovation or improvement in 10 years, that’s still the case. Where is the disruptive newcomer to unseat the mighty Craigslist? Doing a little searching for alternatives yields a lot of options without a lot of good results. The sites are either poor clones (Backpage), poorly designed and cluttered (vFlyer), or gimmicky and just poorly put together (RealPeopleRealStuff). Even the big players are starting to jump into this arena: Google offers Google Base and eBay has opened their international classifieds site Kijiji to the States, but both are still lacking killer features that might net them real market share.
Businessman and Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban recently wrote in a blog post:
There will always be a company that replaces you. At some point your BlackSwan competitor will appear and they will kick your ass. Their product will be better or more interesting or just better marketed than yours, and it also will be free. They will be Facebook to your Myspace, or Myspace to your Friendster or Google to your Yahoo. You get the point. Someone out there with a better idea will raise a bunch of money, give it away for free, build scale and charge less to reach the audience. Or will be differentiated enough, and important enough to the audience to maybe even charge more. Who knows. But they will kick your ass and you will be in trouble.
So what’s it going to take to kick Craigslist’s ass? Here’s my list of features I’d like to see in a new classifieds site (or hell, I’d be just as happy if Craigslist would implement them). Give me these with a simple interface and good design and I’ll jump over in a heartbeat:
-
Video and higher-quality pictures
C’mon guys, this is the age of YouTube, of the Flip Mino and the iPhone 3GS. Why do people still go to garage sales? Because they want to SEE the things they’re buying, from all angles, they want to feel them and judge their size and look for imperfections. If I’m selling a DVD player, I don’t want to invite a stranger into my house just to show them it works. Pretty please let me upload video to my ads. RealPeopleRealStuff does this already, how hard can it be? And while you’re at it, 4 low-quality jpegs is not sufficient to display my wares. Storage is cheap. Amazon, Google, etc. are happy to provide server farms at your disposal. Let’s use em.
-
Location awareness
Newer browsers (Firefox 3.5, Google Chrome) are building location awareness right into your laptop. Web-enabled smartphones with GPS can pinpoint you in seconds and are already providing location-based services to help you find restaurants, gas stations, etc. But even web behemoth Ebay’s classified site Kijiji still relies on subdomain-specific listings like detroit.kijiji.com. How about giving me the option to set a radius from my location (5-500 miles) and show me all posts within that range?
-
Real anonymity
I want to sell something on Craigslist, but I don’t want to freely give out my phone number or email address. But oh, lucky me, Craigslist will post an anonymous email address on my listing and forward me the replies. How sweet of them. Except, now that I’ve got some replies in my inbox, my only option is to expose my real email or phone #. I’d prefer an account to log in to with an inbox, threaded replies, and the ability to respond to would-be buyers without giving out real contact information. Anyone can do this every day on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, etc. Why not on Craigslist?
-
Make it extensible
If the new web services have taught us anything, it’s that providing an API and a way to expand your presence to other parts of the web is vital, nay, essential if you want to survive, and with good reason (which I won’t get into here). When I post a classified online, I want to be able to broadcast that information quickly and easily across my social networks. Give me widgets, give me RSS feeds, and even better give me a way to track this stuff. I want link tracking, visitor trending, I want to tie my posts into Google Analytics. Classifieds by nature get a spike of traffic when they’re listed which steadily falls off as they age. I want to see that traffic curve so I know if it’s time to relist my item, or if I just need to settle for a lower price because people are looking but not biting. And if nothing else, give me a simple way to put my listing on Craigslist as well (vFlyer already does this, to an extent (warning: this link goes to an INCREDIBLY boring video tutorial)). If you’re going to unseat the king, you’ve got to do it in his own castle.
This isn’t a question of if, but of when. It’s true that for any new classifieds site to get any market share, it will need to generate and eventually take traffic away from Craigslist, but if you give people compelling enough features with great function and design, it’s only a matter of time. A service with the attributes I described above is not out of reach for a new tech startup, and making it a viable business would be simple – I know I’d gladly pay a few bucks a month for a premium account that lets me post video, track link stats, etc. I personally can’t believe we’re approaching the second decade of this new millennium while Craigslist is still partying like it’s 1999. I want my Craigslist 2.0. So, who’s going to step up?
