Posts Tagged geeks
Why I’m excited about the Nook
For those of you who don’t know, the Nook is Barnes & Noble’s new eBook reader. It was announced this week, and despite the goofy name, it has instantly shot to the top of my holiday wish list, although it’s at least as much about what I think the Nook represents as the product itself.

A nap nook - my second favorite kind of nook.
See, the whole concept of an eBook reader has been hamstrung from the start by the lack of a common, open format. There are plenty of other hurdles: the lack of color screens, the incredibly slow refresh rates of E-Ink displays, the high cost of adoption. But the real setback in my mind has always been the fact that a physical book doesn’t limit who can read it, or where, or when. You can lend a book to a friend. You can sit in a bookstore and leaf through a book before purchasing. If you buy your books from Barnes&Noble, and your friend buys their books from Borders, that doesn’t mean you can never read your friends books, or vice versa.
A good analogy is the mp3 player. The file format mp3 came along while the only way to consume digital music was still off of physical discs that spun around and were read by “lasers.” But thanks to the internets, and small hard drive space, the mp3 format took off, followed by hardware mp3 players. Think about it: they’re called mp3 players, not emusic players. By the time Apple rolled around to dominate the market, as much as they wanted to use their own fancy proprietary format (AAC), every iThing supports mp3 files. Even the music you buy through iTunes or Amazon can be had DRM-free and device-agnostic.
This has not been the case with ebook readers. Amazon’s Kindle uses their own special format that nobody else can use. If you want to read some other type of file on a Kindle, like a PDF, you have to use their special file conversion software to work some voodoo magic and have it anointed by Bezos blood before it can pass through the fiery tunnel of Whispersync and reach your device. And that’s IF that other file type is supported.
So, why am I excited about the Nook? Because it looks like maybe the final puzzle piece that will topple the ebook format quagmire. The Nook uses the EPUB format, an open format which has also been embraced by Google’s vast store of digitized books, as well as Sony who recently converted their entire store to the format. This essentially leaves the Kindle as the lone proprietary ebook store. And while Google and Sony jumped on the epub bandwagon first, Barnes&Noble is in a unique position to actually compete with Amazon for content. Any ebook reader that comes out from now on will basically be required by market forces to support epub, and from there the road gets a lot smoother.
But that isn’t all. B&N is uniquely taking advantage of their brick-and-mortar stores to do some very booklike things that have been glaringly absent from the current options. You’ll now be able to lend ebooks to a friend for a short period of time (although how many times you can lend a book, or to how many different people, is in question. This thread says that it will be very restrictive, but things can always change. Better to start heavy-handed and get looser than the other way around). You’ll also be able to take your Nook to a B&N and read a book from their online store right on your device, without purchasing. I think this is brilliant, since it really addresses how people actually shop for and handle books. There’s also a great licensing opportunity here. Much like Amazon allows anyone to sell an item through their online store, B&N (or someone else, Borders perhaps) could allow other bookstores to sell digital content through the B&N store and offer similar in-store reading and lending opportunities. Boutique bookstores could actually have a chance to draw customers back to their stores thanks to an ebook reader. I’m not saying it will happen, but it could.
The Nook also has some other nerd-lovable features. To get around the slow refresh, grayscale limitations of E-ink, there’s a capacitive touchscreen LCD at the bottom to help you navigate your library of books and other control features. On top of that, the device is powered by Google’s open mobile OS Android. These two things could open up a world of possibilities. Just a few mundane thoughts: a Pandora app to stream music while you read, or a twitter app to comment on what you’re reading. What I’d really love to see, though, is a coverflow-like page skimmer. It’s already been noted that the Nook will feature a coverflow interface for browsing your books to identify them by the cover, but how about while reading being able to “flip” through pages? One of the biggest inadequacies of ebook readers until now has been poor navigation, the loss of being able to easily jump forward and backward through a novel to find a particular passage based on your memory of physically where it was located in the book. I might cry with joy when I am able to flick through miniature pages on the touchscreen to navigate whatever I’m reading. This might not be available on the Nook when it first hits stores, but it will get there eventually. I’d put money on it.
Should you buy a Nook? There’s still the problem of the cost ($259 upfront, plus buying new books). And even though the content pool has gotten a lot bigger, there’s still a lot not available, including newspapers and out-of-print material. And there are other potential winners coming from companies like Plastic Logic (who have partnered with B&N) and Apple that will have bigger screens, maybe full color, and who knows whatever other features. The Nook is certainly not the perfect ebook reader, and it will get surpassed, but I think it will be the first to break open the ebook floodgates to the public, which is reason enough for an early adopter like me to jump on board.
Where are all the powerful female tech geeks?
I know this is an old and hashed-out subject, but today I came across the T3 Tech 100 list of the one-hundred most influential people in the tech world and couldn’t help but be shocked by the nerdtastic sausage fest.
Not to say that this is the most well-composed top-100 tech list out there. For one thing the list is actually a top-104 with four picks grouping a pair of influentials, including Googmeisters Sergey B. and Larry P. sharing the top spot. I’m also pretty sure that #6 Yong Nam and #70 Woo Hyun Paik are not the same person, despite this list’s appearances. There is also a hint of European bias, not to be unexpected from T3, but worth noting along with a complete gloss over of investors. While on the whole investors may not be “influential”, it’s ridiculous that a few of them aren’t on here. Are you really telling me that Gerhard Schaas – the CTO of a UK-based high-end home theater company – is really more influential than Marc Andreessen or Tim O’Reilly?
But of course the biggest issue I see with this list is the unhealthy amount of Y-chromosomes. Out of 104 listees, only 9 are women (10 if you count Jonathan Ive), and they don’t even crack the top 30. Martha Lane Fox leads the group at #37. Her Tech100 profile tag line? “One of nine women on the Tech 100.” No shit sherlock. You couldn’t come up with anything better? I guess T3 felt it was better to blatantly state the gender gap as opposed to try and ignore it, but I feel bad for Ms. Fox.
My point here though is not that I think this list is inherently or purposefully sexist or something. I just personally find it disheartening that the state of the tech community is still so predominantly male. There’s maybe a couple of other women that should have made this list, though please correct me if I’m wrong. Marissa Mayer of Google comes to mind, as well as President of Oracle Safra Catz (and p.s. how is Larry Ellison not on this list?!?), but that’s about it. And that just sucks.
While the business world, like pretty much everything, continues to be a male-dominated legacy, I feel like the tech world should be a bit different. There’s no reason that a tech-geek chick couldn’t be the next Mark Zuckerberg, or Walt Mossberg, or Berg McBergersberg (note: Mr. McBergersberg is not an actual tech influential). I guess it just bothers me that there’s probably a lot of great innovation and progress to be made that we’re missing out on because it requires some female sensibilities or insight. And I hope a few years from now these Top-X lists will start looking less like a Dan Brown fan club sports pub collegiate computer science classroom and more like a Harry Potter fan club wine bar collegiate biology classroom. Or something. Sorry, I couldn’t come up with a good analogy, but you get the idea.
It’s our fault.
The other night at the family Passover Seder, my sister innocently asked “So, have you heard of this Linux thing?” She said a friend was telling her about it, and when I acknowledged that I had indeed heard of it, she said, “So what’s up with that, is it really something anyone can use?”
It caught me completely off guard because I don’t usually hang out with people who ask that type question, and the complete sincerety and naívete of her phrasing made me burst out laughing.
Then my dad chimed in to ask if Linux had originally come from UNIX, to which my sister questioned, “aren’t those the guys who’ve had their testicles removed?”

The real shame here is that I’ve been a big geek for most of my life. I’ve mucked around in Linux since before GNOME was available. Are there still shortcomings? Of course, and they’ve been hashed out at length all over the place. And a lot of the major issues against “consumer adoption” can also be considered big advantages. All the different distributions cause confusion, the command line is still required, there’s no support for games and adobe blah blah blah…
Truth is, Linux is a viable option for a lot of people nowadays. We – those of us familiar with open source operating systems – know this. My sister hates the Vista installation that came preinstalled on her laptop. She’s told me this. There’s absolutely no reason she couldn’t switch to Ubuntu/Fedora/Take your pick today, other than needing a little helping hand from someone familiar with this strange new territory. But SHE had to ask ME about that Linux thing, and I responded with caution, skepticism, and laughter.
So it’s our fault. The nerds and the geeks out there who debate endlessly with themselves over whether Linux is ready for adoption. This article got a lot of press recently, and I have a lot of respect for the man behind the HeliOS project, and everyone who makes an effort to share their knowledge. For the rest of us, let’s stop thinking of our friends and relatives as incapable of being interested in an alternative operating system. With Live CDs and virtualization there’s really no excuse anymore. I know I’m guilty of it, and I’m going to start making a bigger effort. I’m not looking to convert people, I just want to give them options, which is really what this family of OSes has always been about.
And for those of you who have made the effort to share and inform, how has it gone? I’d love to hear about successes as well as failures, and maybe get some ideas on pitfalls to avoid when approaching this subject with non-geeks. I personally have a bad habit of getting too detailed when it comes to talking about techy things I’m interested in, which is an immediate turn-off to most people.
